(May 2022)
Convergence can be understood as creating financial products
which consist of elements from insurance companies and credit institutions. Instances
of convergence surround us, particularly with how we are offered many products
and services. It is typically the result of market demand for lower prices and
more efficiency. Convergence appears to be driven by technology as well as by
the embrace of a broader perspective in addressing and identifying loss
exposures. Convergence also is a response to market demands for insurers to
provide more to investors in order to attract more capital. It is likely to
affect both insurers and reinsurers.
Convergence products are another example of using
non-traditional methods to address an entity's various loss exposures.
Convergence refers to either an event (act of moving closer together) or a
location (point where two or more things meet each other). Therefore, a
convergent product is some manner of combination. Such combinations are not
formal; they may involve more than two features and "what" is
combined is only limited by the imagination of the entity offering the product.
Product convergence is accomplished in a variety of ways,
combining different coverage aspects such as length of coverage, mechanics of
how coverage is initiated (triggered), scope of coverage and timing of payment.
Non-insurance sources of capital (such as banks and investment houses) are now
becoming providers of funds for handling loss exposures that used to be the
sole domain of insurers.
Businesses that have embraced the notion of enterprise risk
management are demanding more creativity in how various risks are handled. Such
businesses are also more sensitive to returns on investments (ROI), including
the returns they receive from using traditional insurance products. Insurers
that can provide more product approaches to efficiently handle different levels
of loss exposure are in a better position to provide a higher return on a
client's insurance protection investment. Insurers and reinsurers are more
motivated to travel down new product paths.
Emerging product examples include:
Related Article: Securitization
Under traditional insurance, such as a commercial property policy,
coverage is triggered by a single, eligible event.
Example: Acme
Communications Manufacturers has a Commercial Property Policy from Same Ol'
Fire and Casualty. It provides $10,000,000 coverage on a blanket basis to its
three plants. Coverage is triggered by the occurrence of any eligible peril
during the policy period, if the loss exceeds the $100,000 deductible. |
Under a dual or multi-trigger arrangement, coverage is
triggered by two or more events stipulated in the negotiated contract (a
deductible may apply).
|
Example: Acme
Communications Manufacturers negotiates a customized commercial property
contract with Flexible Mutual. It has arranged for $10,000,000 in coverage.
The coverage becomes effective if Acme suffers a loss in excess of $5,000,000
at its main plant and, at the same time, a business interruption loss
exceeding six months occurs at its secondary plant on or after June 1st. Note
that the secondary plant has a completely different set of suppliers and
customers than the main warehouse that is located in a different region of
the country. |
The use of such triggers has become increasingly important
in the design and issuance of catastrophe bonds that, commonly, provide excess
of loss protection for catastrophic weather events, such as hurricanes or
earthquakes but which are also used for other lines of coverage. Whether an
insurer or a non-insurance entity provides multi-trigger coverage, the triggers
are uncorrelated. The lack of correlation substantially reduces the probability
that all of the qualifying events will take place. The lower probability
increases the insurability of a given exposure and the cost is substantially
less than what is available under comparable, single trigger policies.
Typically, multi-trigger arrangements involve pairing an insurable event with
some form of financial index rather than two or more insurable events. Under
the former arrangement, there's a chance that the product will be treated as a
financial derivative rather than an insurance policy (even if the contract is
provided by an insurer).
The use of trigger combinations allows parties to better
predict and price such arrangements using events that can be quantified and
measured. The fact that the events are uncorrelated (and less risky), has
opened gateways to capital markets that, in the past, were not accessible to
insurers. Types of event triggers include:
Example: Farmatron
Inc. is a huge manufacturer of large farm machinery. It wants to protect
itself against catastrophic losses that occur when the company may be
particularly vulnerable. It arranges a policy with Outtabox Mutual that will
pay for property losses in access of an aggregate of $20 million for a given
year, but only if, in that same year, Farm machinery sales for the entire
industry fall by more than 15% from the previous year. |
|
Related
Article: Double-Trigger Contracts
Essentially this refers to any coverage option that packages
two or more lines of business that, traditionally, have only been offered as
single line coverage. Various carriers, usually large line and niche
(specialty) companies, provide such packages. Multi-line protection typically
combines several coverages for a given client.
Example:
Arky-tecks Consultants, Inc. has a "Consult-a-Pro" policy from
Arkycaz Ins. Co. The package includes:
|
The benefits of such coverage exist for both the insurance
provider and the purchaser. Such packages often involve reduced underwriting
cost, improved coordination of coverage (fewer gaps or redundancies),
coordinated territorial coverage, higher account retention, improved loss
handling, etc.
This is another insurer option
that was a common feature several decades ago and, in limited circumstances, is
again available from certain providers. Multiple year policies usually involve
single line coverage, but for up to three to five years. The chief benefit to a
carrier is that it may help preserve market share and reduce policy production
expenses. The greatest advantage to a purchaser is that the price and
protection are locked in for the term of the contract. While the coverage and
coverage cost are guaranteed, the market for such coverage is usually limited
to cover narrow exposures since the applicable carrier would want to avoid long-term liability for
volatile and expensive sources of loss.
Related Article: Finite
Risk Reinsurance
These arrangements are usually (or ideally) pursued by large
and well-funded entities. They may involve either a guaranteed loan or an
addition of equity. Prior to a loss, a company may pay a commitment fee to a
commercial bank (or other financial institution) in exchange for a guaranteed
loan, large enough to handle specified losses in the future. Should a loss
occur, the loan must be provided, regardless of the entity's creditworthiness
at the time of loss. The borrowing company would be obligated to pay back the
loan according to the repayment schedule previously negotiated.
Another form of post-loss funding is an injection of equity.
In this instance, after a loss occurs, a financial firm issues shares and uses
the proceeds to assist a company in handling certain losses. In either case,
the funds are not arranged until after a loss occurs. The entity with the
obligation to provide funds often hedge their position by arranging for
separate reinsurance.
This is a type of cat bond that is triggered by a
combination of a given loss event (indemnity trigger) with an event that is
tied to a given industry’s loss data that is used to create a loss threshold.
This approach is similar to what has been used by the U.S. Government to
provide a catastrophic layer of terrorism coverage. Its provisions are
partially based on a given, high level of aggregate
loss that must occur before excess protection is triggered.
Related Article: Terrorism and Insurance